<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Should We Green Wash for the Sake of Spreading Green to the Masses?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://yourdailythread.com/2009/11/10/should-we-green-wash-for-the-sake-of-spreading-green-to-the-masses/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://yourdailythread.com/2009/11/10/should-we-green-wash-for-the-sake-of-spreading-green-to-the-masses/</link>
	<description>L.A.&#039;s Guide to Green Conscious Living</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 03:08:54 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jourdan</title>
		<link>http://yourdailythread.com/2009/11/10/should-we-green-wash-for-the-sake-of-spreading-green-to-the-masses/comment-page-1/#comment-4457</link>
		<dc:creator>Jourdan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Dec 2009 17:15:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://yourdailythread.com/?p=7914#comment-4457</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t believe we should &quot;green wash&quot; if it means mis-labeling anything.  We already have so many things &quot;mis-labeled&quot; that we do not need to add to it.  Green is truth.  We need things to live, let&#039;s at least try and embrace the truth of what that means and do our best at minimizing the footprint with it.  If you &quot;green wash&quot; everything it will discredit the movement.  I say find the people misusing the term for their product and discredit them.  There should be standards.  Don&#039;t trick the public so they think they are being green and in reality they are not.  Let&#039;s think about public accountability and not let this happen!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t believe we should &#8220;green wash&#8221; if it means mis-labeling anything.  We already have so many things &#8220;mis-labeled&#8221; that we do not need to add to it.  Green is truth.  We need things to live, let&#8217;s at least try and embrace the truth of what that means and do our best at minimizing the footprint with it.  If you &#8220;green wash&#8221; everything it will discredit the movement.  I say find the people misusing the term for their product and discredit them.  There should be standards.  Don&#8217;t trick the public so they think they are being green and in reality they are not.  Let&#8217;s think about public accountability and not let this happen!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marilu Gamboa</title>
		<link>http://yourdailythread.com/2009/11/10/should-we-green-wash-for-the-sake-of-spreading-green-to-the-masses/comment-page-1/#comment-4224</link>
		<dc:creator>Marilu Gamboa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 02:53:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://yourdailythread.com/?p=7914#comment-4224</guid>
		<description>Amit displayed nothing but arrogance in the face of factual truth. I don&#039;t believe we should &quot;green-wash&quot; to spread the green if it means mis-labeling products as eco-friendly, when they are in truth, not so green. Though I would not be opposed to &quot;green-washing&quot; if it means that a &quot;green lifestyle&quot; is made hip and accessible to the mainstream population at large!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Amit displayed nothing but arrogance in the face of factual truth. I don&#8217;t believe we should &#8220;green-wash&#8221; to spread the green if it means mis-labeling products as eco-friendly, when they are in truth, not so green. Though I would not be opposed to &#8220;green-washing&#8221; if it means that a &#8220;green lifestyle&#8221; is made hip and accessible to the mainstream population at large!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
